Comments on: http://papertrap.net/archives/190 Mark's interesting journal. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:59:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: Mark http://papertrap.net/archives/190#comment-870 Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:43:17 +0000 http://papertrap.net/archives/190#comment-870 No, it <em>was</em> meant to be Chad and Wendy. I just didn't want the story to end so they'd never meet again. It would have been too simple and too unhappy. They are friends, after all. No, it was meant to be Chad and Wendy. I just didn’t want the story to end so they’d never meet again. It would have been too simple and too unhappy. They are friends, after all.

]]> by: T. http://papertrap.net/archives/190#comment-869 Mon, 29 Nov 2004 04:23:19 +0000 http://papertrap.net/archives/190#comment-869 Mark, you've put me to shame. It's complex, and bizarre, and totally interesting, and, well, I was always crap at book reviews. What I'm trying to say is that I like it very much, particularly 'At the Satanposium'. (Is the Flash Forward bit near the end supposed to be Ben and Wendy, or do I need it explained to me?) Mark, you’ve put me to shame. It’s complex, and bizarre, and totally interesting, and, well, I was always crap at book reviews. What I’m trying to say is that I like it very much, particularly ‘At the Satanposium’.

(Is the Flash Forward bit near the end supposed to be Ben and Wendy, or do I need it explained to me?)

]]>