Movie Review - The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy
* * * *
Before the movie there was a talk from the promoters saying that in the early 80’s some guys almost made a HHGTTG movie and at the last minute changed their minds and shot ‘Ghostbusters’ instead. Considering how crap things could have turned out, we are really really lucky they waited. This movie totally kicks butt. Like the books and the TV show, the plot is slightly different from the original radio series but nothing is terribly out-of-place and if you’re a fan of the books like me you’re not going to be annoyed. In fact, if you think of it as a new take on an old story rather than a straght translation to film you will definitely get it.
Zooey Deschanel, as expected, was a total babe, and the romantic subplot with Arthur was kinda cute and English-ish. Arthur and Zaphod suffered a bit though. I think Martin Freeman’s acting style was captured better on The Office, since you miss the little awkward nuances when there’s special effects going on all around him - and Zaphod was portrayed as a drunken idiot with a bad American accent instead of the laid-back narcissist he deserves to be. Despite this, no one was completely crap, and the relatively well-preserved comic timing meant that everyone had at least one funny line.
For all the great stuff the filmmakers have done though, I wasn’t much impressed by the storytelling - the second half of the movie seemed rushed, as if they were trying to get through the rest of the plot by cutting out the fun things that get you there, which was really frustrating since the movie ran a lean 110 minutes or so. I understand why the plot was simplified, and it was done interestingly and respectfully, but it still could have been done without making every scene an action scene. Oh, and Slartibartfast was likeable, but nowhere near godly enough. Tut tut.
I don’t know about a series of sequels - it may depend on how well this movie does - but The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy at least works as a tribute to the late Douglas Adams and something for the fans to remember the series by. I’m giving it four stars for old times’ sake.
And for Zooey, of course. Mmmm… Zooey.
6 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
going tonight to see it with DB. Will let you what we think >>
Cheers
Comment by Imaginery Girl — Thursday April 28 2005 @ 4:09 pm
** Loved the book, along time ago**
Comment by Imaginery Girl — Thursday April 28 2005 @ 4:10 pm
I acually hired the BBC series a week or two ago - fucking terrible cheesy horrible BBC 80’s Z grade FX.
I didn’t get past the second ep.
Though would like to see the flick, if only for Tim Office. I have a crush, you see. I’m such a girl.
Comment by mellipop — Thursday April 28 2005 @ 7:29 pm
Mmm… Zooey.
I might go tonight, or maybe tomorrow. Totally looking forward to it.
Comment by Robert — Thursday April 28 2005 @ 8:31 pm
Ew Martin Freeman? There’s hope for us all.
You’ll like the movie though, I think.
Comment by Mark — Friday April 29 2005 @ 1:21 am
Having now seen it, I can comment on the substance of your post.
I was pleasantly surprised by Arthur; I didn’t think Freeman’s wimpish charm was overwhelmed at all.
The Guide entries were hilarious, and were entirely in the spirit of the books — wild tangents that somehow manage to stay relevant to the plot, or better still, to drive it in a new and unpredictable direction.
And Zooey. Mmmm…
Comment by Robert — Sunday May 1 2005 @ 9:11 pm